Sunday, October 05, 2008

‘We killed Hindu leader’ Maoist; Hindus Refuse; Christian Killings Continue

A Maoist group has claimed responsibility for the killing of a Hindu leader, whose death sparked a wave of Hindu-Christian riots in southern India.

Indian nuns protest against the recent violence which has seen Christians attacked.

Sabyasachi Panda, the head of the Communist Party of India-Maoist, told reporters of two private television stations that his group was behind the Hindu leader’s death, the country’s national news agency said Sunday.

The leader, Laxmananda Saraswati, preached the tenets of Hinduism to the tribal people of the state. And Panda said Maoists had earlier warned him to desist from “such works” or face consequences, PTI said.

Panda said the Maoists killed Saraswati because he was “spreading social unrest” in the tribal area, the news agency said.

The Indian government has consistently claimed the shooting death may have been the work of Maoist rebels.

But hardline Hindu groups blamed the state’s Christian minority for Saraswati’s death.

He and four others were killed in August when 20 to 30 gunmen barged into a Hindu school and began shooting.

Afterward, police arrested five Christians as suspects in the case.

The hardliners held up the arrests as proof of Christian complicity. They took to the streets in anger, rampaging through predominantly Christian neighborhoods, ransacking shops and torching houses.

A Christian orphanage was set on fire. A 20-year-old woman, who was teaching children inside, burned to death.

Christian resident fought back, and the clashes spread.

The communal violence left churches and temples razed to the ground. More than 20 people died, and hundreds were arrested.

Even after the Maoists’ claim of responsibility, some fundamentalist Hindu groups blamed Christians for the death.

The hardline Vishwa Hindu Parishad, or World Hindu Council rejected the claim saying the communist group — known as ‘Naxals’ — did not have a religious agenda.

“Have the Maoists started fighting in the name of God now?” VHP leader Subansh Chauhan was quoted as saying by CNN-IBN, CNN’s sister network.

The rebels, who claim to be fighting for the poor and the dispossessed, have been battling the government in an insurgency that has resulted in thousands of casualties since the late 1960s.

Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has called Naxalism India’s biggest security threat. Last year, more than 800 people were killed in Naxal-related violence across the country, according to local media reports.

VHP rejects Maoists’ Swami murder claim– CNN-IBN

prominent Maoist leader on Saturday claimed responsibility for the murder of Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) swami Laxmanand Saraswati and four others, which had sparked off large-scale anti-Christian violence in Orissa’s Kandhamal district in August.

Speaking from an undisclosed location, Maoist leader Sabyasachi Panda told two Oriya news channels that their outfit decided to kill Saraswati because he was spreading “social unrest”.

VHP, however, has rejected the claim saying Naxals don’t have a religious agenda. “Have the Maoists started fighting in the name of God now?” VHP leader Subansh Chauhan said, rejecting Maoists’ claim.

Meanwhile, state Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik has hit back at the Centre for accusing him of not controlling communal violence in Kandhamal.

The Chief Minister shot off a strongly worded letter to Home Minister Shivraj Patil, reminding the Centre of its own shortcomings in controlling terror. He also attacked the Centre for not doing enough to help the state government in controlling the situation at Kandhamal for the initial few weeks of violence.

“The country is facing serious situations threatening the life and the property of its citizens in various states such as Jammu and Kashmir, the north east and other Naxal-affected states. The terror strikes in the very capital of New Delhi itself. (That) must have put great strain on our resources. It is, therefore, not the time to point fingers at the efforts of the state government,” Patnaik said in the letter.

“The Home Minister wrote to yesterday. His letter had many errors and many unjustified points. So I clarified all that,” Patnaik told reporters.

Patnaik also met Orissa Governor M C Bhandare on Saturday evening. After an hour-long meeting, Patnaik apparently felt assured that President’s rule is not likely to be imposed in Orissa.

“I briefed him about the situation in Kandhamal and nothing relating to article 356 was discussed in the meeting,” Patnaik says.

After being on the receiving end for quite some time the Chief Minister of Orissa has finally acted tough on the Centre, but the question remains will he also act tough on communal violence in Kandhamal and bring back peace to the district soon.

No comments:

Post a Comment